• You actively pick individual stocks and want a rules-based system to do it.
• You want factor investing — Quality, Value, and Momentum — scored automatically for every stock.
• You want prebuilt Guru Screens based on Buffett, Graham, or Lynch strategies.
• You want daily editorial coverage and an active investor community.
• You’re UK- or EU-based and focused primarily on equities.

• No proprietary stock scoring or ranking system.
• No prebuilt factor screens or Guru strategy templates.
• Mobile experience is functional but not optimised for stock research.
• Dashboard setup can be overwhelming for new users.
• No community or editorial commentary layer.

• No permanent free tier — 14-day trial only.
• Only ~5 years of core financial statement history.
• Weak ETF coverage — not designed for ETF investors.
• No macro data (rates, FX, economic indicators).
• Charting is functional but not advanced.
• Global coverage requires a higher-tier plan.

500+ metrics covering fundamentals, technicals, and forward consensus estimates. You can filter by region, sector, market cap, valuation percentiles, and custom formula fields on the Pro plan. A useful differentiator: Percentile Ranks show where a stock’s current valuation sits relative to its own history or regional peers — context that raw numbers alone don’t provide.

Best for: custom research workflows, global multi-factor screening, ETF screeners. For a broader look at the European screener landscape, see the best free stock screeners for European investors.

350+ metrics weighted toward factor investing data — earnings quality ratios, value composites, price momentum signals. The key addition is the Guru Screens library: preloaded templates replicating Graham’s Net-Net formula, Greenblatt’s Magic Formula, Lynch’s PEG-based approach, and dozens of others. Start from a proven methodology rather than an empty filter builder.

Best for: systematic stock pickers who want to filter by factor signal and skip the blank-slate setup. Less useful if your primary research is ETF-based or cross-asset.

Koyfin’s charting is comparable to TradingView in depth and flexibility. You can overlay price charts with macroeconomic series — 10-year yields, inflation, GDP — plot earnings or revenue over time instead of price, compare up to 10 securities on a single chart, and use multi-layout workspaces with simultaneous chart views. The financial chart mode, where you chart balance sheet or income statement data over time, is particularly useful for fundamental analysis beyond simple price action.

Stockopedia includes basic price charts and fundamentals visualisation, but it is not a chart-first platform. Its answer to charting is the one-page StockReport — a colour-coded “traffic light” summary of where a stock stands on Quality, Value, and Momentum. This works well for quick due diligence, but if you want to draw trend lines, overlay multiple securities, or run macro comparisons, Stockopedia isn’t the tool for that workflow.

Koyfin gives you analyst estimates, earnings revision history, revenue growth trends, margin data, and valuation multiples — and lets you draw your own conclusions. There is no proprietary scoring system and no automated buy or sell signal. The platform trusts you to do the interpretation. For how Koyfin stacks up against other raw-data-first tools, see the Stock Analysis vs Koyfin comparison and the TIKR vs Koyfin comparison.

Every stock in Stockopedia’s universe arrives pre-scored 0–100 on Quality, Value, and Momentum. The StockReport bundles these scores with risk flags, earnings estimates, and a narrative summary in a single page. For investors who want to move faster — generate a shortlist, check the one-pager, decide — this is significantly more efficient than assembling that view manually from raw data. The tradeoff: you’re trusting the algorithm’s definition of quality and value, not building your own.

Koyfin lets you build model portfolios and watchlists across any supported asset class — stocks, ETFs, bonds, FX, crypto. Performance attribution and benchmark comparison work well. Market coverage is extensive: 70,000+ securities across 150+ exchanges, plus macroeconomic data series from central banks and statistical agencies. For a multi-asset investor who needs one dashboard to hold everything, this breadth is the platform’s strongest argument.

Stockopedia’s portfolio analytics go deeper on the equity side. The platform tracks your portfolio’s aggregate StockRank, visualises factor exposure in Bubble Charts, and includes the NAPS (No Admin Portfolio System) — a rules-based strategy that systematically rotates into the highest-ranked stocks across sectors each year. Portfolio coverage is equities only, which limits utility for investors running mixed ETF and stock portfolios.

Koyfin explicitly covers UCITS ETFs — the fund structure European investors are restricted to under PRIIPs regulations. This makes it one of the few platforms where you can chart and compare UCITS-listed world ETFs, emerging market funds, and bond ETFs using actual ticker data rather than US proxies. If your portfolio is index-ETF-based, Koyfin is the more directly relevant tool of the two.

Stockopedia has strong European equity coverage — UK, Germany, France, Netherlands, the Nordic markets, and more — all scored through StockRanks. For a European individual stock picker who wants a systematic way to filter European small and mid-caps using factor data, Stockopedia is well-suited. Note: Stockopedia’s regional pricing structure means that accessing global or multi-regional coverage requires a higher plan tier than UK-only access.