Cash Drag: T-Bills vs Being Invested

Flat cash or T-bill line versus a steeper invested line with a weight icon on the lower curve
Sitting in “safe” T-bills feels good in rough markets, but it quietly slows compounding. This study shows how much growth you leave on the table versus staying invested.

TL;DR

  • T-bills/timed-out cash = low drawdowns but low long-run growth.
  • Staying invested in stocks = bigger swings but meaningfully more compounding.
  • A “temporary” cash park that lasts years can cost more than one bad year in stocks.

Method

We compare two simple paths over the same timeline:

  • Always Invested: 100% in a broad US stock index (think SPY), dividends reinvested.
  • Always in T-Bills: 100% in a short-term Treasury/T-bill proxy (cash-like), rolling from one bill to the next.

Data modeled on monthly total returns (price + income), fees and taxes ignored. Both paths start at 1.00× and evolve using the same contribution pattern—no timing tricks.

This is a stylized illustration of “cash drag,” not a recreation of any specific ETF or rate history.

Notes

  • “T-bills” here just means a safe, low-volatility, low-yield cash alternative.
  • No shifts from cash to stocks mid-sample: we isolate the gap between staying safe vs staying invested.
  • Numbers are rounded; the point is the trade-off, not the exact decimals.
  • Educational only. This is not personalized investment advice.

Key Chart

Normalized growth of “Always Invested” versus “Always in T-Bills.” Both start at 1.00×. The widening gap is the cost of playing it safe for the whole path.

What the data says

In this kind of pattern, stocks move up and down but trend higher. T-bills barely move at all. The result: a meaningful gap in ending wealth even though the T-bill path never really “hurts.”

This is the core issue with long-term cash: you feel safe in the moment, but you quietly lock in a slower compounding rate. The gap isn’t obvious month to month; it shows up after years.

The summary table below gives rough numbers on growth vs risk for the two paths.

When cash drag is most dangerous

  • You tell yourself you’ll “wait for a better entry,” then sit in cash for years.
  • You park long-term money (retirement, decade-plus goals) in T-bills because markets feel scary.
  • You chase every headline and keep “temporary” cash that never actually goes into your plan.
  • You underestimate how much a few extra percentage points in return matter over 10–20+ years.

When T-bills actually make sense

  • Money you really need soon (rent, taxes, an upcoming big purchase).
  • Your emergency fund—cash is the point there.
  • Short “in-between” periods while you move accounts or clean up your allocation.
  • If market volatility ruins your sleep and you’d otherwise panic-sell.

The key is separating short-term safety money from long-term growth money. Cash/T-bills are for the first bucket, not the second.

Summary

Series CAGR Max DD Worst 12-mo
Always Invested (stocks) ≈5.1% ≈−5.5% ≈−4.8%
Always in T-Bills ≈1.9% ~0.0% ≥0.0%

Illustrative values consistent with the chart. Real-world results will depend on the exact period and instruments used.

Ready to put long-term money to work? Move what’s truly long-term out of “forever cash” and into a real portfolio you can actually hold.

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you open an account using our links. You do not pay extra.

Want to see this with real ETFs? Use TradingView to chart a stock index ETF versus a T-bill or money market proxy and see the gap yourself.

Try TradingView Pro →

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you subscribe using our link. You never pay extra.

Bottom line

Cash and T-bills are tools, not a default parking lot for everything. Use them to protect short-term needs. For long-term goals, the data is clear: staying invested matters more than feeling safe this month.

Go back to the Learn path →

Scroll to Top