Swissquote vs Neon

Broker Comparison · Switzerland

Swissquote vs Neon (2026):
Fees, ETFs, and which Swiss broker to choose

Both are FINMA-regulated Swiss platforms — but they were built for very different investors. Swissquote is a full Swiss bank with a broad product range and a quarterly custody fee; Neon is a mobile-first neobroker with no custody fee, a flat 0.5% transaction cost, and no FX markup on trades. Which one is cheaper depends almost entirely on your portfolio size, trade frequency, and whether you need products beyond stocks and ETFs.

Vintage-style comparison infographic showing Swissquote vs Neon, with two smartphones displaying each broker, a central feature comparison table, coins and financial documents around it, and notes highlighting stocks and ETFs, savings plans, fractional shares, trading fees, and Swiss/EU regulation.

Some of the links on this site are affiliate links, meaning we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you if you sign up through them. This does not affect our reviews or recommendations — we only feature products we genuinely believe are useful for investors. This site provides educational content only, not personalized investment advice. Investments can lose value and past performance does not guarantee future results. You are responsible for your own financial decisions and for confirming the tax and legal rules that apply in your country.


TL;DR

Swissquote
  • Best for larger portfolios where the quarterly custody fee (min CHF 80/yr) is a small fraction of assets.
  • Full Swiss bank — stocks, ETFs, bonds, funds, options, forex, crypto, pillar 3a.
  • Flat CHF 9 fee on ETF Leaders beats Neon’s 0.5% on individual trades above CHF 1,800.
  • CHF 85 charge for e-tax statement; FX conversion at 0.95%.
Neon
  • Best for smaller portfolios and passive investors making regular contributions.
  • No custody fee — your costs scale with activity, not with portfolio size.
  • No FX markup on trade execution (BX Swiss settles everything in CHF). Free tax statements.
  • Limited to ~100 ETFs and ~270 stocks on BX Swiss. No US-listed ETFs.
The core question: If you are building a passive ETF portfolio with smaller regular contributions and don’t need bonds, funds, or a US ETF catalogue, Neon is almost certainly cheaper at lower balances. Once individual trades consistently exceed CHF 1,800 and your portfolio is large enough that CHF 80–200/year in custody fees is a rounding error, Swissquote wins on both breadth and total cost efficiency.

Two very different Swiss platforms

Swissquote and Neon are both FINMA-regulated and Swiss-domiciled — but they operate under completely different business models, fee structures, and investor profiles. There is also a third option worth being aware of: Yuh, a mobile-first neobroker now 100% owned by Swissquote (since 2025), which sits between the two on pricing and product range. We cover all three in our best broker for Switzerland guide.

Swissquote

Founded in 2000 and listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange, Swissquote is a FINMA-licensed Swiss bank. It offers a full product suite covering stocks, ETFs, bonds, funds, options, warrants, structured products, forex, and crypto, alongside multi-currency accounts and a pillar 3a pension product with a broad fund range.

The trade-off: the quarterly custody fee and trading costs make it expensive for small-portfolio investors who contribute modest amounts on a regular basis — especially at the minimum CHF 80/year custody overhead.

Neon

Neon launched in 2019 as a Swiss neobank app, backed by Hypothekarbank Lenzburg which holds the banking license. The Neon Invest feature lets users buy stocks and ETFs on BX Swiss with no custody fee, no FX markup on trade execution, fractional shares, ETF savings plans, and free tax statements. Neon also launched a pillar 3a in 2025.

The trade-off: the 0.5% transaction fee becomes expensive on large individual purchases, and the platform is limited to around 100 ETFs and 270 stocks on BX Swiss — no US-listed ETFs, no bonds, and no active funds.

Feature Swissquote Neon
Founded 2000 2019
Regulated by FINMA (full bank licence) FINMA (via Hypothekarbank Lenzburg)
Deposit guarantee CHF 100,000 (Swiss banking law) CHF 100,000 (via HBL)
ETF range Broad — 1,100+ ETF Leaders on SIX plus wider catalogue ~100 ETFs on BX Swiss only. No US-listed ETFs.
US-listed ETFs (VT, VWRA…) Yes No
Bonds and funds Yes No
Options and derivatives Yes No
Fractional shares Limited (via savings plans) Yes — from CHF 10
ETF savings plans Yes Yes
Pillar 3a Yes — established, broad fund range Yes — since 2025, simpler range
Tax statement CHF 85 (digital) / CHF 100 (paper) Free
Mobile app Good Excellent — mobile-only
Multi-currency accounts Yes — CHF, EUR, USD, GBP and more CHF only

Where the real cost difference lives

The fee models work in opposite directions. Swissquote charges a quarterly custody fee plus a flat trading fee per order. Neon charges no custody fee but takes a percentage of every transaction. Three additional costs apply equally to both — Swiss stamp duty, FX on dividends, and any tax statement fees — but the amounts differ significantly.

Fee type Swissquote Neon
Custody / account fee CHF 20/quarter up to CHF 50k portfolio
CHF 25/qtr (50k–100k) · CHF 37.50/qtr (100k–150k) · CHF 50/qtr max
None
Min. annual custody cost CHF 80/year CHF 0/year
Trading fee — ETF Leaders (SIX) CHF 9 flat per trade 0.5% per trade (min CHF 0.50)
Trading fee — standard ETFs/stocks Tiered by exchange and value (CHF 9–189+) 0.5% per trade
FX conversion on trades 0.95% per conversion None — BX Swiss settles everything in CHF
FX on foreign dividends 0.95% ~1.5% (via partner bank)
Swiss stamp duty 0.075% (CH shares) · 0.15% (foreign) 0.075% (CH shares) · 0.15% (foreign)
e-Tax statement CHF 85 (digital) · CHF 100 (paper) Free
ETF savings plan fee Standard trading fee per execution (from CHF 9) 0.5% per execution — no flat minimum
Trade packs (Swissquote) From CHF 39/trade (pack of 20) — valid 1 year N/A
Inactivity fee Custody fee applies regardless of activity None

Neon’s FX position — what “no FX markup” actually means

Neon trades exclusively on BX Swiss, where all securities — including international stocks and foreign ETFs — execute and settle in CHF. BX Swiss handles the underlying FX internally without charging a markup to the investor. This means buying a USD-denominated ETF on Neon does not trigger an FX conversion fee at the point of trade.

The exception is dividends paid in a foreign currency. If you hold a distributing ETF or stock that pays dividends in USD or EUR, Neon’s partner bank converts those dividends to CHF at roughly 1.5% — a significant cost that compounds over time for dividend-paying holdings.

Practical implication: Investors using accumulating UCITS ETFs (which reinvest dividends internally rather than distributing them) avoid this 1.5% hit entirely. For a passive buy-and-hold investor using an accumulating world ETF on Neon, the effective FX cost on trades is zero.

Neon is cheaper when…
  • Your portfolio is small — the CHF 80–200/year custody fee alone is a heavy drag for Swissquote at low balances.
  • You invest small amounts via a savings plan — 0.5% on CHF 300/month is CHF 1.50, versus CHF 9 at Swissquote.
  • You prefer no FX markup on trade execution and invest via accumulating ETFs.
  • You want free tax statements rather than paying CHF 85/year.
Swissquote is cheaper when…
  • Individual trades are large enough that Swissquote’s savings on per-trade costs exceed the CHF 80–200/year custody overhead.
  • Your portfolio is large and custody fees represent a tiny fraction of total assets.
  • You need US-listed ETFs, bonds, funds, or options — Neon simply doesn’t offer them.
  • You want a full desktop trading platform with multi-currency accounts and advanced order types.
Per-trade break-even: Swissquote’s CHF 9 flat fee on ETF Leaders equals Neon’s 0.5% at a trade size of CHF 1,800. But that’s only the per-trade comparison — the CHF 80/year minimum custody fee must also be recovered. The true total-cost break-even is higher. See the scenarios section below for worked examples.

Fee scenarios: who pays less and by how much

Three common investor profiles, each using an accumulating world UCITS ETF listed on SIX (ETF Leader category at Swissquote). Stamp duty at 0.15% for foreign-domiciled ETFs applies equally to both. Tax statement cost included for Swissquote where relevant.

Scenario A Monthly saver · CHF 300/month · 12 trades/year
Cost line Swissquote Neon
Trading fees CHF 9 × 12 = CHF 108 0.5% × CHF 3,600 = CHF 18
Custody fee CHF 80 (min) CHF 0
Stamp duty (0.15%) CHF 5.40 CHF 5.40
Tax statement CHF 85 (optional) CHF 0
Total annual cost ~CHF 193–278 ~CHF 23

Verdict: Neon wins by CHF 170–255/year. At small monthly amounts, the CHF 9 flat fee plus the custody overhead makes Swissquote disproportionately expensive. The tax statement fee alone exceeds Neon’s entire annual trading cost.

Scenario B Quarterly investor · CHF 2,000/quarter · 4 trades/year
Cost line Swissquote Neon
Trading fees CHF 9 × 4 = CHF 36 0.5% × CHF 8,000 = CHF 40
Custody fee CHF 80 (min) CHF 0
Stamp duty (0.15%) CHF 12 CHF 12
Tax statement CHF 85 (optional) CHF 0
Total annual cost ~CHF 128–213 ~CHF 52

Verdict: Neon wins by CHF 76–161/year. Even though Swissquote’s per-trade cost is now lower than Neon’s (CHF 9 vs CHF 10 per trade), the CHF 80 custody overhead keeps Neon comfortably ahead on total annual cost. This pattern continues until trades become significantly larger.

Scenario C Lump-sum investor · CHF 8,000 per trade · 2 trades/year
Cost line Swissquote Neon
Trading fees CHF 9 × 2 = CHF 18 0.5% × CHF 16,000 = CHF 80
Custody fee CHF 80 (min) CHF 0
Stamp duty (0.15%) CHF 24 CHF 24
Tax statement CHF 85 (optional) CHF 0
Total annual cost ~CHF 122–207 ~CHF 104

Verdict: Neon still slightly cheaper without the tax statement; Swissquote cheaper if you need the e-tax (CHF 122 vs CHF 104). At this trade size, Swissquote’s CHF 9 flat fee saves substantially on a per-trade basis — but the CHF 80 custody overhead almost entirely cancels that saving at just 2 trades/year. For the two to truly tie on total cost, per-trade savings need to consistently outpace the custody overhead.

The custody overhead rule of thumb: For Swissquote to win on total annual cost, the savings from Swissquote’s flat fee versus Neon’s 0.5% must exceed CHF 80/year (the minimum custody overhead). At 4 trades/year, this requires each trade to be above roughly CHF 5,800. At 2 trades/year, above roughly CHF 11,600. At 12 trades/year, above roughly CHF 2,067. The more frequently you invest, the lower the per-trade break-even — but at small amounts per trade, Neon wins decisively regardless.

What you can actually invest in

For Swiss investors, both platforms provide access to the core UCITS ETF range needed for a passive portfolio. But the gap in breadth is significant — particularly for investors who want US-listed ETFs, bond exposure, or active funds.

Neon has no US-listed ETFs. Neon trades exclusively on BX Swiss, which lists around 100 ETFs — all European UCITS-compliant. US-listed ETFs such as VT (Vanguard Total World), VWRA (Vanguard FTSE All-World Acc), or SPY are not available. Swiss investors following a Bogleheads-style approach using US-domiciled ETFs must use Swissquote, Interactive Brokers, or Saxo. For a passive portfolio using European UCITS trackers (IWDA, VWRL, CSEMU), Neon’s range is typically sufficient.

Asset class Swissquote Neon
UCITS ETFs Yes — 1,100+ ETF Leaders on SIX plus wider catalogue Yes — ~100 ETFs on BX Swiss
US-listed ETFs Yes No — BX Swiss only
Swiss stocks (SIX / BX Swiss) Yes Yes — ~270 stocks on BX Swiss
International stocks Yes — US, EU, Asian markets Yes — via BX Swiss listings
Bonds Yes — government and corporate No
Active funds / OEICs Yes — fund supermarket No
Options and warrants Yes No
Crypto Yes (via Swissquote Bank) No
Pillar 3a Yes — established, broad fund range Yes — since 2025, simpler range
Fractional shares Limited (via savings plans) Yes — from CHF 10
For passive ETF investors: Both platforms cover the essential UCITS equity ETFs — global trackers like IWDA, VWRL, or CSEMU are accessible on both. The gap matters most if you want US-listed ETFs, individual bonds, or actively managed funds — all Swissquote-only. If a two-ETF UCITS portfolio (global equity + Swiss equity) covers your needs, Neon’s range is adequate.

App, interface and investor tools

Neon is built mobile-first and prioritises simplicity. Swissquote has a full web trading platform with research tools and multi-currency workflows — at the cost of more complexity for new investors.

Swissquote
  • Full web trading platform and mobile app
  • Advanced charting and order types (limit, stop-loss, conditional)
  • Multi-currency accounts (CHF, EUR, USD, GBP and more)
  • Research tools, news feed, and market analysis
  • Portfolio reporting and performance tracking
  • Trade packs available for active traders (20 trades from CHF 39/trade)
  • Steeper learning curve — more interface complexity for new investors
Neon
  • Mobile-only — the app is the platform
  • Clean, beginner-friendly interface; fee transparency shown before confirming trades
  • Integrated with Neon bank account (CHF)
  • ETF savings plan setup directly in app
  • Fractional shares — invest from CHF 10
  • Free e-tax statement generated automatically each year
  • Limited research tools — no advanced charting or in-depth analytics

Who should use which platform

Choose Swissquote if…
  • Your portfolio is large enough that CHF 80–200/year in custody fees is a negligible fraction of total assets.
  • Individual trades regularly exceed CHF 5,800–11,600 where flat fee savings start to outweigh the custody overhead.
  • You want US-listed ETFs (VT, VWRA), bonds, active funds, or options.
  • You need a full pillar 3a with a broad fund range.
  • You want multi-currency accounts to hold USD or EUR natively.
  • You prefer a full desktop trading platform with advanced order types and research tools.
Choose Neon if…
  • You are building a passive ETF portfolio with a small or growing balance.
  • You invest through a regular savings plan with smaller monthly contributions.
  • Paying zero custody fee matters — your cost should scale with activity, not with assets held.
  • A UCITS-only ETF range of ~100 ETFs is sufficient for your strategy (no US-listed ETFs needed).
  • You use accumulating ETFs — you avoid the 1.5% dividend FX cost entirely.
  • Free tax statements and a simple mobile experience are the priority.
Could you use both?

Some Swiss investors use Neon for their regular ETF savings plan contributions — taking advantage of no custody fee and the competitive 0.5% cost at small amounts — and then switch to Swissquote for occasional larger lump-sum investments where the flat CHF 9 fee makes more sense.

Splitting platforms adds complexity and two tax statements to manage. If your strategy is simple and your portfolio is at an early stage, Neon alone is the cleaner choice. As your balance grows and your needs expand — especially if you want US ETFs, bonds, or a full pillar 3a — Swissquote becomes the more capable long-term home.

What about Yuh?

Yuh — now 100% owned by Swissquote since 2025 — sits between the two on pricing: no custody fee, 0.5% trading commission (same as Neon), but a 0.95% FX fee on trades in foreign currencies. Unlike Neon, Yuh does charge for FX conversion on each foreign trade. For most passive investors choosing between this pair, Neon or Swissquote is the cleaner decision; Yuh is worth considering if you want a neobank experience backed by Swissquote’s infrastructure.

See our full Yuh review and best broker Switzerland guide for the full three-way comparison.


Ready to open an account?

Both platforms are free to open with no minimum deposit. Model your expected annual trading volume against the fee scenarios above before committing — the right choice depends heavily on how much you invest per trade, not just which platform looks cheaper on the headline.



Frequently asked questions

Is Swissquote better than Neon?

It depends on your portfolio size and what you need from a platform. Neon is cheaper for smaller portfolios and passive ETF investors making regular smaller contributions — there is no custody fee, no FX markup on trade execution, and free tax statements. Swissquote makes more sense at larger balances where the quarterly custody fee (minimum CHF 80/year) is a small fraction of assets, and when you need products Neon doesn’t offer: US-listed ETFs, bonds, active funds, options, or multi-currency accounts.

Does Neon charge custody fees?

No. Neon Invest charges no custody or account maintenance fee. It earns on a 0.5% transaction fee applied to each trade. There is also no FX markup on trade execution — everything on BX Swiss settles in CHF, so buying a foreign ETF doesn’t trigger a currency conversion charge. The one FX cost to watch is on foreign-currency dividends, which are converted to CHF by the partner bank at roughly 1.5%. Investors using accumulating ETFs (which reinvest dividends internally) avoid this cost entirely.

Does Neon have a pillar 3a?

Yes. Neon launched a pillar 3a account in 2025. It is a simpler offering than Swissquote’s established 3a product, which gives access to a broader range of funds and ETFs. If pillar 3a investing is central to your plan — particularly if you want to invest in a specific fund range — compare both offerings directly before deciding. Swissquote’s 3a has a longer track record and more product depth.

Can Neon investors buy US ETFs like VT or VWRA?

No. Neon Invest trades exclusively on the BX Swiss exchange, which lists around 100 ETFs — all UCITS-compliant European ETFs. US-listed ETFs such as VT, VWRA, or SPY are not available on Neon. For Swiss investors who want US-listed ETFs, or who follow a strategy using US-domiciled funds, Swissquote or Interactive Brokers are the relevant alternatives. For passive investors content with a UCITS tracker like IWDA or VWRL, Neon’s range is typically sufficient.

Does Swissquote offer ETF savings plans?

Yes. Swissquote allows you to set up automated investment plans (savings plans) to buy ETFs or funds at regular intervals. Each plan execution is subject to the standard trading fee — starting at CHF 9 for ETF Leaders on SIX. Neon also supports ETF savings plans at 0.5% per execution with no flat minimum, making it cheaper for smaller monthly amounts (below roughly CHF 1,800 per contribution).

Does Swissquote charge for tax statements?

Yes. Swissquote charges CHF 85 for a digital e-tax statement and CHF 100 for a paper version. These statements simplify Swiss tax filing by allowing you to scan a barcode rather than entering every transaction manually. Neon provides tax statements for free at the start of each year. For small-portfolio investors this CHF 85 difference is material — at CHF 300/month invested on Neon, the Swissquote tax statement alone costs more than Neon’s entire annual trading fees.

Which is better for passive ETF investing in Switzerland — Swissquote or Neon?

For a simple ETF savings plan with a smaller or growing portfolio, Neon is typically cheaper — no custody fee, no tax statement fee, and no FX markup on trade execution. As your portfolio grows and individual trades get larger, Swissquote becomes more competitive on a per-trade basis. But the CHF 80/year minimum custody fee must be factored in. The true total-cost break-even depends on how many trades you make per year: at 4 trades/year, Swissquote only wins on total cost when each trade exceeds roughly CHF 5,800. Use the Swiss broker cost calculator to model your specific scenario.

QuantRoutine provides educational content only. Nothing on this page is an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy or sell any security or to open an account with any specific broker. Fee figures are based on publicly available information and may change — always verify current pricing on each broker’s official website before opening an account. Fee scenario calculations are illustrative and do not account for all possible cost variables. Investments can lose value, and past performance does not guarantee future results. You are responsible for your own investment, tax, and legal decisions.